Paper evaluation form

Evaluate the next claims on the five-point-scale

Evaluation criterion No Rather no than yes More or less Rather yes than no Yes
The paper is well readable          
Language used in the paper is correct          
The paper is logical and well structured          
The general typeset of the paper is correct          
The paper was interesting to read          
The paper gives a good overview of the topic          
The material in the paper is mathematically correct          
References to the external sources are presented correctly          
All the relevant references are present           
The formulae are typed correctly          

Answer the following questions in free text.

  1. How to evaluate the selection of the topic?
  2. How to evaluate general presentation style?
  3. How to evaluate the selection of the information given in the paper?
  4. How to evaluate typesetting of the paper?
  5. What was new and interesting to me in the paper?
  6. What else would I have liked to read?

Please refer to specific shortcomings.

  1. The paper has the following misprints:
  2. The paper has the following mistakes in wording and style:
  3. The paper has the following mathematical mistakes:
  4. The paper has the following mistakes in typesetting:
  5. The paper will be more readable if the author makes the following changes:
  6. The paper misses the following elements (topics, references, figures, proof steps, etc.):
  7. The following elements could be removed from the paper:
  8. Other comments: