Assignments
Student | Supervisor | Topic |
---|---|---|
Milintsevich Kirill | Kairit Sirts | Neural Named Entity Recognition in Estonian |
Mariia Godgildieva | Marlon Dumas | Manual Versus Automated Feature Encoding of Unevenly Spaced Time Series |
Prabhant Singh | Tobias Jacobs | Neural architecture search |
Sebastian Värv | Amnir Hadachi | Predicting arrival time from GPS location data |
Egert Georg Teesaar | Sven Laur | Detection and visualisation of treatment trajectories |
Viacheslav Komisarenko | Meelis Kull | Approximate name of the topic is Calibration methods in deep learning |
Kateryna Peikova | Kaur Alasoo | Principal Component Analysis of genotype data from various populations |
Anastasiia Shalygina | Meelis Kull | Implementation and evaluation of BAdaCost algorithm |
Reasearch plan
Student | Received |
---|---|
Milintsevich Kirill | OK |
Mariia Godgildieva | OK |
Prabhant Singh | OK |
Sebastian Värv | OK |
Egert Georg Teesaar | OK |
Viacheslav Komisarenko | OK |
Kateryna Peikova | OK |
Anastasiia Shalygina | OK |
Alina Vorontseva | OK |
First draft
Student | Received |
---|---|
Milintsevich Kirill | OK |
Mariia Godgildieva | OK |
Prabhant Singh | OK |
Sebastian Värv | OK |
Egert Georg Teesaar | OK |
Viacheslav Komisarenko | OK |
Kateryna Peikova | OK |
Anastasiia Shalygina | OK |
Alina Vorontseva | OK |
Reviewing tasks
The following table describes which persons you need to review. So find your row and review the persons who are in this row.
Student | Reviewer 1 | Reviewer 2 | Extra eviewer |
---|---|---|---|
Milintsevich Kirill | Sebastian Värv | Viacheslav Komisarenko | |
Mariia Godgildieva | Egert Georg Teesaar | Anastasiia Shalygina | |
Prabhant Singh | Milintsevich Kirill | Anastasiia Shalygina | |
Sebastian Värv | Milintsevich Kirill | Mariia Godgildieva | |
Egert Georg Teesaar | Mariia Godgildieva | Sebastian Värv | |
Viacheslav Komisarenko | Alina Vorontseva | Kateryna Peikova | |
Kateryna Peikova | Alina Vorontseva | Prabhant Singh | |
Anastasiia Shalygina | Viacheslav Komisarenko | Egert Georg Teesaar | |
Alina Vorontseva | Kateryna Peikova | Prabhant Singh |
Reviewing guidlines
- Review is not a listing of grammar errors
- Review is a listing of logical errors and ideas to pursue further
- It is ok to say in the review that you did not understand certain paragraphs or concepts
- Review should give suggestion in terms of presentation of ideas and layout
- Review should contain a clear opinion about the work you are reviewing
- Still be polite and write the review in the form you would like to receive
First write a short paragraph describing the work as a whole. Write what is good and bad in it and derive your final judgement about the work. Next fill the following reviewing form. This review form contains questions that provide a framework to structure you critical comments into separate blocks. So use those question sections to convey your critical comments about the work.
A good review mostly discards all grammar mistakes and deals with presentation and content. Try to write something that yourself would find instructive if you were an author. In particular, mark all places which you cannot understand or which seem illogical to you as a reader. For those of you who have not done it before, there is a longer Estonian tutorial how to review. It is a long text and covers different reviewing levels so do not implement all suggestions. Send the final review to me and the person who you are reviewing. If you do not know the mail address of the author send it only to me. I will forward it.
- I will not accept reviews that contains only a listing of grammar errors
- I will not accept reviews that have no clear opinion about the work
- The opinion can be completely wrong or unfair as long as it is justified
Presentations
22.05 Liivi 2-512 @14:15
- Viacheslav Komisarenko
- Alina Vorontseva
- Kateryna Peikova
- Mariia Godgildieva
29.05 Liivi 2-512 @14:15
- Anastasiia Shalygina
- Milintsevich Kirill
- Sebastian Värv
- Egert Georg Teesaar
- (Prabhant Singh)
Progress
Student | Initial draft | First draft | Reviews | Final report |
---|