Institute of Computer Science
  1. Courses
  2. 2019/20 spring
  3. Research Seminar in Data Mining (MTAT.03.277)
ET
Log in

Research Seminar in Data Mining 2019/20 spring

Older Datamining Seminars: 2010k » 2011k » 2012s » 2014k » 2014s » 2015k » 2015s » 2016k » 2016s » 2017k » 2017s

  • About
  • Supervisors
  • Presentations
  • Assignments
  • Deadlines

Assignments

To be filled based on students choices

StudentSupervisorTopic
Joonas PuuraRaivo KoldeAnalysis of Cost Deviations within Patient Care using Electronic Health Records data
Meelis PerliDietmar PfahlUsing Artificial Neural Networks for Predictive Mutation Testing
Anne OttSven LaurSimilarity based clustering and dynamic changes in medical data

Reasearch plan

1. Research Plan
Solutions for this task can no longer be submitted.
StudentReceivedDefended

Defending assignments

Reviewing tasks

The following table describes which persons you need to review. So find your row and review the persons who are in this row.

StudentReviewer 1Reviewer 2Extra eviewer

Reviewing guidlines

  • Review is not a listing of grammar errors
  • Review is a listing of logical errors and ideas to pursue further
  • It is ok to say in the review that you did not understand certain paragraphs or concepts
  • Review should give suggestion in terms of presentation of ideas and layout
  • Review should contain a clear opinion about the work you are reviewing
  • Still be polite and write the review in the form you would like to receive

First write a short paragraph describing the work as a whole. Write what is good and bad in it and derive your final judgement about the work. Next fill the following reviewing form. This review form contains questions that provide a framework to structure you critical comments into separate blocks. So use those question sections to convey your critical comments about the work. SPage linktrong? A good review mostly discards all grammar mistakes and deals with presentation and content. Try to write something that yourself would find instructive if you were an author. In particular, mark all places which you cannot understand or which seem illogical to you as a reader. For those of you who have not done it before, there is a longer Estonian tutorial how to review. It is a long text and covers different reviewing levels so do not implement all suggestions. Send the final review to me and the person who you are reviewing. If you do not know the mail address of the author send it only to me. I will forward it.

  • I will not accept reviews that contains only a listing of grammar errors
  • I will not accept reviews that have no clear opinion about the work
  • The opinion can be completely wrong or unfair as long as it is justified

Presentations

Progress

StudentInitial draftFirst draftReviewsFinal report
  • Institute of Computer Science
  • Faculty of Science and Technology
  • University of Tartu
In case of technical problems or questions write to:

Contact the course organizers with the organizational and course content questions.
The proprietary copyrights of educational materials belong to the University of Tartu. The use of educational materials is permitted for the purposes and under the conditions provided for in the copyright law for the free use of a work. When using educational materials, the user is obligated to give credit to the author of the educational materials.
The use of educational materials for other purposes is allowed only with the prior written consent of the University of Tartu.
Terms of use for the Courses environment