Seminars
Tuesday 16.00 - 17:45 , Ülikooli 17 - 218
- Session 1 (12.02) - Introduction to Seminar
- Session 2 (19.02) - Finalizing the seminar topics
- Session 3 (26.02) - Presentation by students about their topics
- 5 min per person - Backed by slides
- A page of abstract about the selected project
Remaining schedule will be decided on Session 3
'Student groups:
- Group 1: Saeid Mousavifar, Priit Paluoja, Tek Raj Chhetri, Alo Peets, Said Kazimov
--Course Rules--
- We will grade all three presentations, Peer Review and Final Report
- We set 3 ratings: Good (+1), Neutral (0) and Bad (-1)
- To pass the course one should score >= 2 in total
- Intermediate and final Presentations are graded for Presentation, Progress and Punctuality
- You meet your topic supervisor every week and update him – Good (+1)
- You miss a week – Neutral (0)
- You miss 2 weeks or miss the presentation – Bad(-1)
- Topic presentation along with updates is good, neutral and bad as per your topic supervisor
- Peer Review:
- Performed and convincing report – Good
- Performed but not so convincing report - Neutral
- Reports not sent to peers in time - Bad
- Report:
- Good writing and decent summary of the work – Good
- Major issues with structure or language – Neutral
- Bad report – Bad
- Session 4 (05.03) -
- Session 5 (12.03) -
- Session 6 (19.03) -
- Session 7 (26.03) -
- Session 7 (02.04) -
- Session 8 (09.04) - Intermediate Presentation 1 - Group 1
- Session 9 (16.04) -
- Session 10 (23.04) - Prof. Marko Simeunovic - Information sharing in Internet of Things networks.
Information extraction from frequency modulated signals and possibilities of improvements by parallel computing.
- Session 11 (30.04) - Intermediate Presentation 2 - Group 1
- Session 12 (07.05) - Presentations by Jakob Mass (Slides), Chinmaya Dehury
- Session 13 (14.05) -
- Session 14 (21.05) - Final presentation - Group 1
- Seminar report should be sent to your peers.
- You have to send your report to next two persons for peer review, considering the people in the group as a cycle.
- Report should be ACM double column - 6 pages
- Peer review the reports sent to you. Send the reports to peers by 25.05 23:55.
- Session 15 (28.05) - No session
- Authors should modify the report, upload it and inform Satish Srirama, your subsupervisor and Peers