Seminars
Wednesday 16.15 - 18.00 , Ülikooli 17 - 218
- Session 1 (05.09) - Introduction to Seminar
- Session 2 (12.09) - Finalizing the seminar topics
- Presentation by Dr. Chii Chang
- Session 3 (19.09) - Presentation by students about their topics
- 5 min per person - Backed by slides
- A page of abstract about the selected project
Remaining schedule was decided on Session 3
Chain: Viktor, Saeid, Alo, Chetri
- We will grade all three presentations, Peer Review and Final Report
- We set 3 ratings: Good (+1), Neutral (0) and Bad (-1)
- To pass the course one should score >= 2 in total
- Intermediate and final Presentations are graded for Presentation, Progress and Punctuality
- You meet your topic supervisor every week and update him – Green (+1)
- You miss a week – Neutral (0)
- You miss 2 weeks or miss the presentation – Red (-1)
- Topic presentation along with updates is good, neutral and bad as per your topic supervisor
- Peer Review:
- Performed and convincing report – Green
- Performed but not so convincing report - Neutral
- Reports not sent to peers in time - Red
- Report:
- Good writing and decent summary of the work – Green
- Major issues with structure or language – Neutral
- Bad report – Red
- Session 4 (26.09) -
- Session 5 (03.10) -
- Session 6 (10.10) - Intermediate Presentation 1
- Session 7 (17.10) -
- Session 8 (24.10) -
- Session 9 (31.10) -
- Session 10 (07.11) -
- Session 11 14.11) - Intermediate Presentation 2
- Session 12 (21.11) -
- Session 13 (28.11) -
- Session 14 (05.12) - Jakob Mass ( Slides)
- Session 15 (12.12) - Final presentation
- Seminar report should be sent to your peers.
- You have to send your report to next two persons for peer review, considering the people as the cycle in that order:
- Report should be ACM double column - 6 pages
- Peer review the reports sent to you by 17.12
- Session 16 (19.12) - No session
- Authors should modify the report, upload it and inform Chii Chang, Satish Srirama, your subsupervisor and Peers