Arvutiteaduse instituut
  1. Kursused
  2. 2015/16 sügis
  3. Andmekaeve uurimisseminar (MTAT.03.277)
EN
Logi sisse

Andmekaeve uurimisseminar 2015/16 sügis

Older Datamining Seminars: 2008k » 2008s » 2009k » 2009s » 2010k » 2011k » 2012s » 2014k » 2014s » 2014k

  • About
  • Track I: Deep Learning for NLP
    • Timetable
    • Creating tests
    • Project ideas
    • Projects
    • Keras
  • Track II: Research Projects
    • Presentations
    • Assignments
    • Deadlines

Assignments

StudentSupervisorTopic
Janno Jõgeva---Generating 3D point cloud of a corridor system/large room using monocular SLAM
Huishi YinDietmar PfahlExtracting Questions and Comments about Open Source IDEs as a Source for Software Requirements
Tõnis TasaTauno MetsaluBayesian dosage adjustement during on-going treatment
Ilya VerenichFabrizio MaggiBusiness Process Performance Optimization by Reducing Overprocessing
Andres Traumann---Shape from Shading
Alena IgnatyevaMark FishelUnsupervised discovery of content words in a bilingual context

Reviewing tasks

The following table describes which persons you need to review. So find your row and review the persons who are in this row.

StudentMust review 1Must review 2
Janno JõgevaAndres TraumannHuishi Yin
Huishi YinAlena IgnatyevaJanno Jõgeva
Tõnis TasaAndres TraumannIlya Verenich
Ilya VerenichAlena IgnatyevaTõnis Tasa
Andres TraumannJanno JõgevaHuishi Yin
Alena IgnatyevaIlya VerenichTõnis Tasa

Reviewing guidlines

  • Review is not a listing of grammar errors
  • Review is a listing of logical errors and ideas to pursue further
  • It is ok to say in the review that you did not understand certain paragraphs or concepts
  • Review should give suggestion in terms of presentation of ideas and layout
  • Review should contain a clear opinion about the work you are reviewing
  • Still be polite and write the review in the form you would like to receive

First write a short paragraph describing the work as a whole. Write what is good and bad in it and derive your final judgement about the work. Next fill the following reviewing form. This review form contains questions that provide a framework to structure you critical comments into separate blocks. So use those question sections to convey your critical comments about the work.

A good review mostly discards all grammar mistakes and deals with presentation and content. Try to write something that yourself would find instructive if you were an author. In particular, mark all places which you cannot understand or which seem illogical to you as a reader. For those of you who have not done it before, there is a longer Estonian tutorial how to review. It is a long text and covers different reviewing levels so do not implement all suggestions. Send the final review to me and the person who you are reviewing. If you do not know the mail address of the author send it only to me. I will forward it.

  • I will not accept reviews that contains only a listing of grammar errors
  • I will not accept reviews that have no clear opinion about the work
  • The opinion can be completely wrong or unfair as long as it is justified

Presentations

  1. ...

Progress

StudentInitial draftFirst draftReviewsFinal report
Janno JõgevaOKOKOK
Huishi YinOKOKOK
Tõnis TasaOKOKOK
Ilya VerenichOKOK--
Andres TraumannOKOKOK
Alena IgnatyevaOKOKOK
  • Arvutiteaduse instituut
  • Loodus- ja täppisteaduste valdkond
  • Tartu Ülikool
Tehniliste probleemide või küsimuste korral kirjuta:

Kursuse sisu ja korralduslike küsimustega pöörduge kursuse korraldajate poole.
Õppematerjalide varalised autoriõigused kuuluvad Tartu Ülikoolile. Õppematerjalide kasutamine on lubatud autoriõiguse seaduses ettenähtud teose vaba kasutamise eesmärkidel ja tingimustel. Õppematerjalide kasutamisel on kasutaja kohustatud viitama õppematerjalide autorile.
Õppematerjalide kasutamine muudel eesmärkidel on lubatud ainult Tartu Ülikooli eelneval kirjalikul nõusolekul.
Tartu Ülikooli arvutiteaduse instituudi kursuste läbiviimist toetavad järgmised programmid:
euroopa sotsiaalfondi logo it akadeemia logo